Thuban more modular?
jan at intevation.de
Tue Apr 5 07:30:57 CEST 2005
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 06:10:55PM +0200, Bernhard Herzog wrote:
> While this is true in principle -- GREAT-ER is a good example for this
> -- the extensibility is relatively limited. Some things that you might
> want to do are not yet easily possible, like adding a new source of
> shapes as the ogr extension has shown.
ah well, I am working this one - though at a slow pace.
> However, and this is an area where Thuban could improve IMO, the
> infrastructure we are building with this process should also be used by
> the standard components of Thuban. That will help to ensure that the
> way plugins interact with Thuban is generic enough and not geared too
> much toward one particular implementation. It will also improve the
> architecture of Thuban by reducing the coupling between the components
> and increasing the modularity.
So, are you proposing to go for a raster plugin (provided Jonathan
likes to do the work)?
Jan-Oliver Wagner http://intevation.de/~jan/
Intevation GmbH http://intevation.de/
More information about the Thuban-devel