GREAT-ER catchement pre-processing comments
jan at intevation.de
Tue Apr 16 19:22:05 CEST 2002
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 04:12:17PM +0200, Frederik Verdonck wrote:
> Some suggestions:
> - Addition of 'untreated discharges' as a separate type of discharge: in
> the Rupel basin, I had to consider untreated discharges as 'fake' WWTP
> with fraction treated set to 0.
I reevaluated this and it might be easier than intially thought.
However, I am not in the position to do any testing based on
GREAT-ER 1.0 on this subject. But if anyone currently works
on a catchment processing and has some non (TF|AS) types,
then I can incorporate the new type and leave testing
to the corresponding guys.
I am also willing to help others to extend the pre-processing
on their own (it is Free Software) and incorporate new WWTP types.
Jan-Oliver Wagner http://intevation.de/~jan/
Intevation GmbH http://intevation.de/
More information about the Great-er-list