swig expert

[Bernhard Reiter]

On Friday 06 October 2006 18:06, Didrik Pinte wrote:
> > Lately we thought that doing a python-wrapper for shapelib without swig
> > is better, because there is so much fine tuning when you use swig for
> > each language that you do not win much in using swig.
>
> Any suggestion for a swig-replacement ? Boost.Python ?

I think Bernhard (Herzog) would just use C and Python to wrap the libraries
like described in the Python documentation.

Bernhard

-- 
Managing Director - Owner, www.intevation.net       (Free Software Company)
Germany Coordinator, fsfeurope.org       (Non-Profit Org for Free Software)
www.kolab-konsortium.com   (Email/Groupware Solution, Professional Service)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.intevation.de/pipermail/thuban-devel/attachments/20061014/c12da650/attachment.bin