pyshapelib 0.4

[Bram de Greve]

Darn, I always end up replying to the poster instead of the list =)

2009/8/18 Bernhard Reiter <bernhard at intevation.de>

>
> Sure, we can have a seperate webpage as soon as we want to.
> Should be make it a subwebpage to Thuban or would you want a new
> entry for wald? The latter gives you the chance to seperate pyshapelib even
> more, have its own SCM, webpage, developer list and so on...
>

Well, maybe if we do it, we should do it properly?

Though if possible, I would like to see the svn history retained.  I know it
can be done (been there before), but it is a bit of command line work, and
some patience =)


> > I don't understand though how b lowers the risk as you need to do more
> > work before the release ...
>
> I've meant there is more pressure to get Thuban and pyshapelib out then,
> though of course there is more work. This addresses the danger that we
> manage
> to get 1.2.2 out, but fail to get out 1.2.3 with pyshapelib afterwards.


OK, I get it now.  For me it's all the same.  Once it gets in the trunk, I'm
sure it's bound to be released _some_ day =)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.intevation.de/pipermail/thuban-devel/attachments/20090818/d34b76a6/attachment.html