tests, Extensions and __init__

Bernhard Reiter bernhard at intevation.de
Fri Nov 26 19:46:16 CET 2004


On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 04:30:14PM +0100, Bernhard Herzog wrote:
> Bernhard Reiter <bernhard at intevation.de> writes:
> 
> > On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 04:23:39PM +0100, Bernhard Herzog wrote:
> >> Bernhard Reiter <bernhard at intevation.de> writes:
> >> 
> >> > I think that we need to refrain from  using __init__.py
> >> > to make Extensions a package for code clarity reasons.
> [...]
> > Empty files is what I have meant with "not using" them.
> 
> Well, the mere presence of the __init__.py turns a directory into a
> package, so the way you phrased it implied removing them.  

I guess I wasn't precise enough on that one...

> Hoever, now that I read your post again, are you talking about
> Extensions/__init__.py?  The problems we've had came from the
> __init__.pys one level deeper.

I know.
A language problem hit me: the plural of extension is extensions,
I probably should have expressed that differently.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.intevation.de/pipermail/thuban-devel/attachments/20041126/a4ba25a5/attachment.bin


More information about the Thuban-devel mailing list

This site is hosted by Intevation GmbH (Datenschutzerklärung und Impressum | Privacy Policy and Imprint)