Directly in CVS? (Re: raster layer properties and mask patches)
Bernhard Reiter
bernhard at intevation.de
Thu Jan 27 20:44:55 CET 2005
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 08:13:21PM +0100, Bernhard Herzog wrote:
> I think we need to distinguish between a) having this flag in the GUI
> and b) actually storing it in the .thuban files.
>
> Personally, I don't think we should have that flag in the first place,
> but if enough people want it, why not? It won't be much work to remove
> it if it turns out nobody uses it. BTW, besides you and Jonathan, who
> does actually want it?
>
> b) is a different matter. If it turns out the flag is actually used and
> people really do expect it to be saved we could perhaps add that later,
> but lets leave it out of the file format for now. Adding it later is
> easy, taking it out again is impossible. File formats live forever.
Okay, I think this is sensible.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.intevation.de/pipermail/thuban-devel/attachments/20050127/14d2456e/attachment.bin
More information about the Thuban-devel
mailing list
This site is hosted by Intevation GmbH (Datenschutzerklärung und Impressum | Privacy Policy and Imprint)