Directly in CVS? (Re: raster layer properties and mask patches)

[Bernhard Reiter]

On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 01:31:05PM -0500, Jonathan Coles wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 27.01.2005, 18:56 +0100 schrieb Bernhard Herzog:

> > If we save it into the .thuban file, we have to support it in future
> > versions of Thuban.  I don't want that to happen for settings that
> > aren't really necessary.

We could keep it in CVS for now 
to see if other implementations will help
and if people actually need it.

> i disagree that it's not necessary, but if everyone agrees that they
> don't want it, i'll take it out and make the mask manditory.
> 
> btw, from russell's post, he discovered that alpha support is only
> available with gdal >= 1.2.4. what version are we supporting and should
> i make some changes so that *only if* alpha band support is available it
> is used?

This is CVS HEAD, I do not think we decided on a gdal version yet.
I go along with saying that support for other gdal versions is good
to keep if the cost for keeping it are low enough.

However I think that Nina's stuff will most likely require a recent gdal.
Whe people start to want this, then depending on gdal-1.2.5 is not a
problem.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.intevation.de/pipermail/thuban-devel/attachments/20050127/66911a6c/attachment.bin